Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669 vs ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 takes 8 weighted points vs 2.3, winning on CPU Benchmark, Amazon Rating, Price. The winner also sits in a more competitive value tier — a clear-cut call.

Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669

Snapdragon X1-26-100 · Integrated (Snapdragon iGPU)

Under $700
4.2 (160)
Check Prices
VS
Winner

ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · Integrated (AMD iGPU)

Under $700
4.5 (127)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategoryAspire A16-11MT-X669Vivobook M1607KA-DS54
Gaming3/102.8/10
Productivity4.8/103.8/10
Programming4.6/104/10
Engineering / 3D3.4/103.5/10
Student5.6/104.3/10
Travel / Portability6.1/103.4/10
AI Workloads3.1/103.3/10
Value for Money6.3/106.9/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecAspire A16-11MT-X669Vivobook M1607KA-DS54
CPUSnapdragon X1-26-100AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
PassMark Score16,35920,239
CPU Cores83P+3S
GPUIntegrated (Snapdragon iGPU)Integrated (AMD iGPU)
G3DMark Score——
RAM16 GB DDR516 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableNo (soldered)No (soldered)
Storage512 GBSSD512 GBSSD
Display16″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1200
Refresh Rate120 Hz60 Hz
Pixel Density142 PPI142 PPI
TouchscreenYesNo
Weight3.42 lbsnull lbs
Thickness0.63″0.7″
Amazon Rating4.2 ★ (160)4.5 ★ (127)
Value Score6.3/106.9/10

CPU Comparison

The ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54's AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is ~24% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (20,239 vs 16,359). Noticeable in sustained workloads, less so in everyday browsing.

GPU & Gaming

Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 4.8/10 vs 3.8/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Aspire A16-11MT-X669: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 120 Hz. Vivobook M1607KA-DS54: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 60 Hz. The Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669's higher refresh rate wins for motion clarity.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Aspire A16-11MT-X669: 16 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 512 GBSSD. Vivobook M1607KA-DS54: 16 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 512 GBSSD.

Build & Portability

3.42 lbs / 0.63″ vs null lbs / 0.7″. The Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669 is 3.4 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 6.1 vs 3.4.

Value

Value scores land 6.3/10 vs 6.9/10. The ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 — it wins the weighted spec battle and costs less. Choose the Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669 only if portability matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Aspire A16-11MT-X669

More on the ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54