Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV vs ASUS TUF FA617_280W

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV takes 10.5 weighted points vs 7.3, winning on CPU Benchmark, GPU Benchmark, Weight. The ASUS TUF FA617_280W counters in a higher tier — worth it if its strengths match your needs.

Winner

Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

Intel Core i9 13900H · NVIDIA RTX 5060

Under $1600
5 (4)
Check Prices
VS

ASUS TUF FA617_280W

AMD Ryzen 7 7735H · AMD Radeon RX 7700S

Under $1600
3.9 (13)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategoryNitro V ANV15-52-98KVTUF FA617_280W
Gaming6.1/105.4/10
Productivity5.2/105.3/10
Programming4.5/105.9/10
Engineering / 3D5.6/105.6/10
Student5.2/105.1/10
Travel / Portability5/104.9/10
AI Workloads5.5/105.6/10
Value for Money7.5/107.4/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecNitro V ANV15-52-98KVTUF FA617_280W
CPUIntel Core i9 13900HAMD Ryzen 7 7735H
PassMark Score27,43423,636
CPU Cores6P+8E8
GPUNVIDIA RTX 5060AMD Radeon RX 7700S
G3DMark Score20,83915,384
RAM16 GB DDR532 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableYesYes
Storage1 TBSSD2 TBSSD
Display15.6″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x10801920x1200
Refresh Rate165 Hz165 Hz
Pixel Density141 PPI142 PPI
TouchscreenNoNo
Weight4.66 lbs4.85 lbs
Thickness0.93″0.87″
Amazon Rating5 ★ (4)3.9 ★ (13)
Value Score7.5/107.4/10

CPU Comparison

The Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV's Intel Core i9 13900H is ~16% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (27,434 vs 23,636). Noticeable in sustained workloads, less so in everyday browsing.

GPU & Gaming

The RTX 5060 in the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV is ~35% faster (20,839 vs 15,384 G3DMark) — a full settings-tier advantage.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 5.2/10 vs 5.3/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV: 15.6″ IPS 1920x1080 @ 165 Hz. TUF FA617_280W: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 165 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV: 16 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD. TUF FA617_280W: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 2 TBSSD.

Build & Portability

4.66 lbs / 0.93″ vs 4.85 lbs / 0.87″. Effectively identical to carry. Travel scores: 5 vs 4.9.

Value

Value scores land 7.5/10 vs 7.4/10. The Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV — it wins the weighted spec battle. Choose the ASUS TUF FA617_280W only if its specific strengths matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Nitro V ANV15-52-98KV

More on the ASUS TUF FA617_280W