Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K vs ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 takes 5 weighted points vs 4.8, winning on Amazon Rating, Price, Value Score. The winner also sits in a more competitive value tier — a clear-cut call.

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H · Integrated (Intel iGPU)

Under $800
4.2 (406)
Check Prices
VS
Winner

ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54

AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · Integrated (AMD iGPU)

Under $700
4.5 (127)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategorySwift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718KVivobook M1607KA-DS54
Gaming3/102.8/10
Productivity5.3/103.8/10
Programming5/104/10
Engineering / 3D3.8/103.5/10
Student6/104.3/10
Travel / Portability6.7/103.4/10
AI Workloads3.5/103.3/10
Value for Money6.7/106.9/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecSwift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718KVivobook M1607KA-DS54
CPUIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen AI 5 340
PassMark Score25,02320,239
CPU Cores6P+10E3P+3S
GPUIntegrated (Intel iGPU)Integrated (AMD iGPU)
G3DMark Score——
RAM16 GB DDR516 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableNo (soldered)No (soldered)
Storage512 GBSSD512 GBSSD
Display14″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1200
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
Pixel Density162 PPI142 PPI
TouchscreenYesNo
Weight2.91 lbsnull lbs
Thickness0.59″0.7″
Amazon Rating4.2 ★ (406)4.5 ★ (127)
Value Score6.7/106.9/10

CPU Comparison

The Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K's Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is ~24% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (25,023 vs 20,239). Noticeable in sustained workloads, less so in everyday browsing.

GPU & Gaming

Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 5.3/10 vs 3.8/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K: 14″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 60 Hz. Vivobook M1607KA-DS54: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 60 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K: 16 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 512 GBSSD. Vivobook M1607KA-DS54: 16 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 512 GBSSD.

Build & Portability

2.91 lbs / 0.59″ vs null lbs / 0.7″. The Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K is 2.9 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 6.7 vs 3.4.

Value

Value scores land 6.7/10 vs 6.9/10. The ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54 — it wins the weighted spec battle and costs less. Choose the Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K only if portability matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K

More on the ASUS Vivobook M1607KA-DS54