Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K vs ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94

ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 takes 10.8 weighted points vs 3.5, winning on CPU Benchmark, RAM, Storage. The Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K counters in a higher tier — worth it if its strengths match your needs.

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H · Integrated (Intel iGPU)

Under $800
4.2 (406)
Check Prices
VS
Winner

ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 · Integrated (AMD iGPU)

Under $1200
4.3 (248)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategorySwift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718KVivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94
Gaming3/103.7/10
Productivity5.3/105.9/10
Programming5/105.9/10
Engineering / 3D3.8/104.6/10
Student6/106/10
Travel / Portability6.7/106.6/10
AI Workloads3.5/104.2/10
Value for Money6.7/106.7/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecSwift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718KVivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94
CPUIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
PassMark Score25,02329,570
CPU Cores6P+10E4P+6S
GPUIntegrated (Intel iGPU)Integrated (AMD iGPU)
G3DMark Score——
RAM16 GB DDR524 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableNo (soldered)No (soldered)
Storage512 GBSSD1 TBSSD
Display14″ IPS14″ OLED
Resolution1920x12002880x1800
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz
Pixel Density162 PPI243 PPI
TouchscreenYesNo
Weight2.91 lbs4.14 lbs
Thickness0.59″0.55″
Amazon Rating4.2 ★ (406)4.3 ★ (248)
Value Score6.7/106.7/10

CPU Comparison

The ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94's AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is ~18% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (29,570 vs 25,023). Noticeable in sustained workloads, less so in everyday browsing.

GPU & Gaming

Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 5.3/10 vs 5.9/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K: 14″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 60 Hz. Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94: 14″ OLED 2880x1800 @ 120 Hz. The ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94's OLED panel is the clear quality win.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K: 16 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 512 GBSSD. Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94: 24 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 1 TBSSD.

Build & Portability

2.91 lbs / 0.59″ vs 4.14 lbs / 0.55″. The Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K is 1.2 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 6.7 vs 6.6.

Value

Value scores land 6.7/10 vs 6.7/10. Both offer comparable performance for their respective classes.

Final Verdict

Buy the ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94 — it wins the weighted spec battle. Choose the Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K only if portability matter more to you.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72T-718K

More on the ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED M5406WA-AH94