ASUS TUF FA617_280W vs Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH

Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10

Winner: Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH

Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH takes 12.3 weighted points vs 3.5, winning on CPU Benchmark, GPU Benchmark, Pixel Density. Read our comprehensive Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH review or see the full ASUS TUF FA617_280W review. The ASUS TUF FA617_280W counters in a higher tier — worth it if its strengths match your needs.

ASUS TUF FA617_280W

AMD Ryzen 7 7735H · AMD Radeon RX 7700S

Under $1600
3.9 (13)
Check Prices
VS
Winner

Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH

AMD Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 · NVIDIA RTX 5070

Under $1700
5 (3)
Check Prices

Use-Case Scores

CategoryTUF FA617_280WAERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH
Gaming5.4/106.4/10
Productivity5.3/106.1/10
Programming5.9/106.2/10
Engineering / 3D5.6/106.3/10
Student5.1/105.9/10
Travel / Portability4.9/106/10
AI Workloads5.6/106.3/10
Value for Money7.4/108.3/10

Detailed Specification Comparison

SpecTUF FA617_280WAERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 7735HAMD Ryzen 9 AI HX 370
PassMark Score23,63635,173
CPU Cores84P+8S
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SNVIDIA RTX 5070
G3DMark Score15,38420,472
RAM32 GB DDR532 GB DDR5
RAM UpgradeableYesYes
Storage2 TBSSD1 TBSSD
Display16″ IPS16″ IPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh Rate165 Hz165 Hz
Pixel Density142 PPI189 PPI
TouchscreenNoNo
Weight4.85 lbs4.19 lbs
Thickness0.87″0.79″
Amazon Rating3.9 ★ (13)5 ★ (3)
Value Score7.4/108.3/10

CPU Comparison

The Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH's AMD Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 is ~49% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (35,173 vs 23,636). A generational gap you will feel in exports, compiles and heavy multitasking. Read more in our in-depth TUF FA617_280W benchmark breakdown and AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH performance review.

GPU & Gaming

The RTX 5070 in the Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH is ~33% faster (20,472 vs 15,384 G3DMark) — a full settings-tier advantage. best gaming laptops guide.

Productivity & Battery

Office scores: 5.3/10 vs 6.1/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.

Display

TUF FA617_280W: 16″ IPS 1920x1200 @ 165 Hz. AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH: 16″ IPS 2560x1600 @ 165 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.

RAM, Storage & Upgradeability

TUF FA617_280W: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 2 TBSSD. AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH: 32 GB DDR5 (upgradeable) + 1 TBSSD.

Build & Portability

4.85 lbs / 0.87″ vs 4.19 lbs / 0.79″. The Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH is 0.7 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 4.9 vs 6.

Value

Value scores land 7.4/10 vs 8.3/10. The Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH extracts more performance per dollar.

Final Verdict

Buy the Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH — it wins the weighted spec battle. You can read the detailed Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH review or compare alternative models in our laptop comparison tool.

Check PricesCheck Prices

Also Consider

More on the ASUS TUF FA617_280W

More on the Gigabyte AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH