- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBSSD
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.92 lbs
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB vs ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T
Benchmark-weighted head-to-head · data updated 2026-09-10
Winner: Acer Aspire Slim 8GB
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB takes 10.5 weighted points vs 2.8, winning on CPU Benchmark, RAM, Storage. Read our comprehensive Acer Aspire Slim 8GB review or see the full ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T review. The ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T counters in a higher tier — worth it if its strengths match your needs.
Acer Aspire Slim 8GB
Intel Core 3 N355 · Integrated (Intel iGPU)
ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T
Intel Celeron N4500 · Integrated (Intel iGPU)
Use-Case Scores
| Category | Aspire Slim 8GB | VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | 2.1/10 | 1/10 |
| Productivity | 3/10 | 2.1/10 |
| Programming | 2.3/10 | 1.1/10 |
| Engineering / 3D | 2.5/10 | 1/10 |
| Student | 4.1/10 | 4.4/10 |
| Travel / Portability | 2.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| AI Workloads | 2.2/10 | 1/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
Detailed Specification Comparison
| Spec | Aspire Slim 8GB | VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core 3 N355 | Intel Celeron N4500 |
| PassMark Score | 10,446 | 1,770 |
| CPU Cores | 8 | 2 |
| GPU | Integrated (Intel iGPU) | Integrated (Intel iGPU) |
| G3DMark Score | — | — |
| RAM | 8 GB DDR5 | 4 GB DDR4 |
| RAM Upgradeable | No (soldered) | No (soldered) |
| Storage | 128 GBSSD | 64 GBeMMC |
| Display | 15.6″ IPS | 14″ IPS |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1366x768 |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Pixel Density | 141 PPI | 112 PPI |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Weight | null lbs | 3.3 lbs |
| Thickness | 0.74″ | 0.67″ |
| Amazon Rating | 4.5 ★ (580) | 3.7 ★ (299) |
| Value Score | 6.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
CPU Comparison
The Acer Aspire Slim 8GB's Intel Core 3 N355 is ~490% faster in multi-threaded PassMark (10,446 vs 1,770). A generational gap you will feel in exports, compiles and heavy multitasking. Read more in our in-depth Aspire Slim 8GB benchmark breakdown and VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T performance review.
GPU & Gaming
Neither carries a dedicated GPU — both fine for esports at low settings, neither for modern AAA gaming. For dedicated gaming silicon, check our best gaming laptops guide.
Productivity & Battery
Office scores: 3/10 vs 2.1/10. Battery isn't in our dataset, but both share a similar power class, so expect comparable endurance.
Display
Aspire Slim 8GB: 15.6″ IPS 1920x1080 @ 60 Hz. VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T: 14″ IPS 1366x768 @ 60 Hz. Panel quality is effectively even.
RAM, Storage & Upgradeability
Aspire Slim 8GB: 8 GB DDR5 (soldered) + 128 GBSSD. VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T: 4 GB DDR4 (soldered) + 64 GBeMMC.
Build & Portability
null lbs / 0.74″ vs 3.3 lbs / 0.67″. The ASUS VivoBook Go 14 Flip J1400KA-DS02T is 3.3 lbs lighter — significant for daily carry. Travel scores: 2.9 vs 4.7.
Value
Value scores land 6.5/10 vs 4.6/10. The Acer Aspire Slim 8GB extracts more performance per dollar.
Final Verdict
Buy the Acer Aspire Slim 8GB — it wins the weighted spec battle. You can read the detailed Acer Aspire Slim 8GB review or compare alternative models in our laptop comparison tool.
Also Consider
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-31P-3947
General · Traditional · 4.3 (654)
- Intel Core i3-N305
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBFlash
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.9 lbs
ASUS Vivobook Go E1504FA-AS33
General · Traditional · 4.3 (408)
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR5
- 128 GBSSD
- 15.6″ 60Hz
- 3.59 lbs
ASUS Vivobook X1404VA-I38128
General · Traditional · 3.9 (6)
- Intel Core i3-1315U
- Integrated
- 8 GB DDR4
- 128 GBSSD
- 14″ 60Hz
- lbs





